Decision: After review, It was decided to notify the petitioner of the request issued on December 28, 2017, as it is the relevant party to proceed with the file, and it must
Decision After review, We decide to notify the petitioner once again, given they have capacity to move forward with the case and that no decision can be made before notifying the petitioner which
Decision After review, Further to all previous decisions, and in light of the letters directly sent repeatedly and directly from the Administration and the failure to enforce any of the previous decisions, we
Decision: After review, We have decided to reconfirm the previous decisions to return the letters sent directly by the administration on procedural grounds, and to refer a copy of the current request,
On August 5, 2015, an enforcement notice for the decision dated 22/7/2015 was received from the petitioner, and it was appended to the file. On August 5, 2015, the maritime agent was
Edit Edit date and time Decision After review, The following was decided: 1) Task the petitioner with clarifying whether it was notified of any decision by the Enforcement Department to seize the cargo
Decision After review, We have decided to refer the letter to the Case Authority at the Ministry of Justice to take a position and present any demands in a legal manner. July 1,
Decision After review of the letter issued by the Directorate General of Customs, we have decided to dismiss it in form. December 8, 2014, Judge Translated by Human Rights Watch
ت 429/2014 Petitioner: The Lebanese State – Ministry of Public Works and Transport Ruling On behalf of the Lebanese People The Judge of Urgent Matters in Beirut, After review of the documents,
Left to Right May 7, 2014 Urgent Matters Judge Decision Margin Number: 429/2014 Issued on: April 30, 2014 Number: 429/2014 Petitioner: Lebanese State – Ministry of Public Works and Transport Subject:
