Republic of Lebanon Ministry of Public Works and Transport Directorate General of Land & Maritime Transport Extremely Urgent 6/3187 April 14, 2014 To: The Ministry of Justice Cases Authority – Re: Request
Left to Right May 7, 2014 Urgent Matters Judge Decision Margin Number: 429/2014 Issued on: April 30, 2014 Number: 429/2014 Petitioner: Lebanese State – Ministry of Public Works and Transport Subject:
Lebanese Republic Ministry of Public Works and Transport Directorate General of Land & Maritime Transport Extremely Urgent 6/4431 June 2, 2014 To: Ministry of Justice – Case Authority RE: Prioritization of selling the
ت 429/2014 Petitioner: The Lebanese State – Ministry of Public Works and Transport Ruling On behalf of the Lebanese People The Judge of Urgent Matters in Beirut, After review of the documents,
Omar Wafik Tarabah Lebanese State Laywer Civil and Arbitration Cases Masters in Private Law Beirut, July 11, 2014 To: HH Head of the Case Authority at the Ministry of Justice RE: Request to
Republic of Lebanon Ministry of Public Works and Transport Directorate General of Land & Maritime Transport 6/8435 November 26, 2014 To: Ministry of Justice – Case Authority Re: Request to take the necessary action
Decision After review of the letter issued by the Directorate General of Customs, we have decided to dismiss it in form. December 8, 2014, Judge Translated by Human Rights Watch
(left to Right) Omar Wafik Tarabah Lawyer of the Lebanese State Civil and Arbitration Cases Masters in Private law To: HH the Head of Case Authority at the Ministry of Justice Petition December
ي Republic of Lebanon Ministry of Public Works and Transport Directorate General of Land & Maritime Transport 6/2832 April 8, 2014 To: Ministry of Justice – Case Authority Re: Request to speed
Decision After review, We have decided to refer the letter to the Case Authority at the Ministry of Justice to take a position and present any demands in a legal manner. July 1,
Edit Edit date and time Decision After review, The following was decided: 1) Task the petitioner with clarifying whether it was notified of any decision by the Enforcement Department to seize the cargo
On August 5, 2015, an enforcement notice for the decision dated 22/7/2015 was received from the petitioner, and it was appended to the file. On August 5, 2015, the maritime agent was
Decision: After review, We have decided to reconfirm the previous decisions to return the letters sent directly by the administration on procedural grounds, and to refer a copy of the current request,
Decision After review, Further to all previous decisions, and in light of the letters directly sent repeatedly and directly from the Administration and the failure to enforce any of the previous decisions, we
Decision After review, We decide to notify the petitioner once again, given they have capacity to move forward with the case and that no decision can be made before notifying the petitioner which
Decision: After review, It was decided to notify the petitioner of the request issued on December 28, 2017, as it is the relevant party to proceed with the file, and it must
